On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 02:03:19PM +0100, Greg Stark wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > > My own position is based on having maintained a pg_regress suite an order of > > magnitude larger than that. I don't know why that outcome was so different.
> And does your pg_regress test suite actually find many bugs or does it > mainly detect when functionality has changed and require updating > expected results to match? It found plenty of bugs and required plenty of expected output updates. > >> I suspect any effort to significantly improve Postgres test coverage is > >> doomed until there's an alternative to pg_regress. > > > > There is the src/test/perl/TestLib.pm harness. > > Sadly I think the test suite is only half the battle. Certainly. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
