On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:25 PM, David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 24 August 2015 at 14:29, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> > I have to admit I don't much like it either, originally I had this as an >> > extra property that was only seen in EXPLAIN VERBOSE. >> >> Seems like a reasonable design from here. > > > The attached patch has the format in this way. > >> >> (Note that for non-text output, >> I'd say the field should come out unconditionally. We only care about >> >> abbreviating in text mode.) >> > > If that's the case then why do we not enable verbose for all of the non-text > outputs? > It seems strange to start making exceptions on a case-by-case basis.
Moved to CF 2015-09. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
