I wrote:
> What I had in mind in <38448.1430519...@sss.pgh.pa.us> was to convert CTEs
> into plain subqueries during the prepjointree phase, either just before
> or as part of the pull_up_subqueries pass (since you'd want the converted
> subquery to be flattened if possible).
After looking at the code a bit, IMO the most reasonable thing to do is to
include this transformation in inline_set_returning_functions(), perhaps
renaming it to something like inline_srfs_and_ctes(). You could invent
a separate function instead, but that would require an extra pass over
the rangetable, for no particular benefit that I can see; the separate
function would have to be called from *exactly* the same set of places
as inline_set_returning_functions(), anyway, or it would not work right
for multiple levels of query optimization.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
