On 2015-08-30 11:33:28 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > Yeah, I'm not really thrilled with all of this information being > available to everyone on the system. We already get ding'd by people > for not limiting who can see what connections there are to the database > and this is doubling-down on that.
I don't buy that the relevant piece of information is the CN when the connection itself is visible. Neither do I buy the argument that later hiding this for ssl once we have more granular permissions is going to be relevantly painful in comparison to changing the contents of pg_stat_activity itself. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
