On 2015-08-30 15:28:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > No no no, I'm proposing to remove the above-quoted lines and the configure > test. sig_atomic_t is required by C89; there is no reason anymore to > cope with it not being provided by <signal.h>.
Ok, that works for me. You seemed to be a bit more doubtful about the sig_atomic_t support, that's why I thought you might want to do something but rip it out. Seems like a pretty low risk thing to try. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
