On Sep 3, 2015 7:30 PM, "Robert Haas" <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All of these objections seem pretty thin to me. I'd accept any of > them as a reason for preferring one alternative over another, but I > don't accept that the presence of a few problems of this magnitude > means we should give up on the feature. It's a good enough feature > that it is worth the possibility of slightly inconveniencing someone > running in an unusual configuration.
I give up. Though I still don't see any compelling reason for this to be in libpq itself. By the way, what about mixing conninfo and uris - should this not be allowed? - Alex
