> > It is expected, and documented. (It's also different in 9.5, see > > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=c6b3c939b7e0f1d35f4ed4996e71420a993810d2 > ) >
Ah, thanks! > > If nothing else, it seems that the concatenation operator should be > listed > > on the operator precedence table at > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/sql-syntax-lexical.html#SQL-PRECEDENCE-TABLE > > Both >= and || fall into the "any other operator" case, no? > I somehow missed that in the table, assuming that >= would be somewhere with > and =. Thanks again.
