Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned checkpointing

[Takashi Horikawa]

>     As to 'partitioned checkpointing' case, the results shown in that
graph
> is probably worth than bug-fix version.
              ^^^^^
              worse

Sorry for typo.
--
Takashi Horikawa
NEC Corporation
Knowledge Discovery Research Laboratories


> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Takashi Horikawa
> Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 11:36 PM
> To: Fabien COELHO
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned checkpointing
> 
> Hello Fabien,
> 
> I wrote:
> > A guc parameter named 'checkpoint_partitions' is added.
> > This can be set to 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16.
> > Default is 16. (It is trivial at this present, I think.)
> I've noticed that the behavior in 'checkpoint_partitions = 1' is not the
> same as that of original 9.5alpha2.
> Attached 'partitioned-checkpointing-v3.patch' fixed the bug, thus please
> use
> it.
> I'm sorry for that.
> 
> PS. The result graphs I sent was obtained using original 9.5alpha2, and
> thus
> that results is unrelated to this bug.
>     As to 'partitioned checkpointing' case, the results shown in that
graph
> is probably worth than bug-fix version.
> 
> Best regards.
> --
> Takashi Horikawa
> NEC Corporation
> Knowledge Discovery Research Laboratories
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Takashi
> Horikawa
> > Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 11:50 AM
> > To: Fabien COELHO
> > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned checkpointing
> >
> > Hello Fabien,
> >
> > > I wanted to do some tests with this POC patch. For this purpose, it
> would
> > > be nice to have a guc which would allow to activate or not this
feature.
> > Thanks.
> >
> > > Could you provide a patch with such a guc? I would suggest to have the
> > number
> > > of partitions as a guc, so that choosing 1 would basically reflect the
> > > current behavior.
> > Sure.
> > Please find the attached patch.
> >
> > A guc parameter named 'checkpoint_partitions' is added.
> > This can be set to 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16.
> > Default is 16. (It is trivial at this present, I think.)
> >
> > And some definitions are moved from bufmgr.h to xlog.h.
> > It would be also trivial.
> >
> > Best regards.
> > --
> > Takashi Horikawa
> > NEC Corporation
> > Knowledge Discovery Research Laboratories

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature