On 2015-09-14 12:03:31 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 9/13/15 2:43 AM, David Rowley wrote: > >Are you worried about this because I've not focused on optimising float > >timestamps as much as int64 timestamps? Are there many people compiling > >with float timestamps in the real world? > > My $0.02: the default was changed some 5 years ago so FP time is probably > pretty rare now. I don't think it's worth a bunch of extra work to speed > them up.
Agreed. That's not why I'm arguing for it. It's about having kind of duplicate code that's not exercised at al. by any common setup. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
