On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>>>> <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>>> Jim Nasby wrote:
>>>>>> I think things like pageinspect are very different; I really can't see 
>>>>>> any
>>>>>> use for those beyond debugging (and debugging by an expert at that).
>>>>> I don't think that necessarily means it must continue to be in contrib.
>>>>> Quite the contrary, I think it is a tool critical enough that it should
>>>>> not be relegated to be a second-class citizen as it is now (let's face
>>>>> it, being in contrib *is* second-class citizenship).
>>>> Attached patch is latest patch.
>>> The previous patch lacks some files for regression test.
>>> Attached fixed v12 patch.
>> The patch could be applied cleanly. "make check" could pass successfully.
>> But "make check-world -j 2" failed.
> Thank you for looking at this patch.
> Could you tell me what test you got failed?
> make check-world -j 2 or more is done successfully in my environment.

I tried to do the test again, but initdb failed with the following error.

    creating template1 database in data/base/1 ... FATAL:  invalid
input syntax for type oid: "f"

This error didn't happen when I tested before. So the commit which was
applied recently might interfere with the patch.


Fujii Masao

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to