Dean Rasheed <[email protected]> writes:
> On 21 September 2015 at 16:09, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> After trying to rework the comment to explain what maxdig really meant
>> after your changes, I came to the conclusion that it'd be better to do
>> it as per attached. Does this look sane to you?
> Yes that looks better. It's still the same amount of extra headroom
> (21), but I think it's clearer your way.
OK, pushed (after further hacking on the comment ...)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
