hmmm... hate to resend it, but i have never seen this passing through...
re-attempt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Serguei Mokhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: January 02, 2003 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump.options.diff -- Take III
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: January 02, 2003 6:16 PM
>
> > static void
> > usage(void)
> > {
> > #if defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG)
> > #define xo(longOption,shortOption,desc) printf("%s %s\n", longOption, desc)
> > #else
> > #define xo(longOption,shortOption,desc) printf("%s %s\n", shortOption, desc)
> > #endif
> >
> > ... lots of xo() calls ...
> >
> > #undef xo
> > }
> >
> > This gives us the convenience of a very short name within the usage()
> > subroutines, while not polluting the namespace for everyplace else in
> > these utilities.
>
> Revised patch attached as per above.
>
> -s
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
