Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I think Alvaro's position is unduly conservative: to the extent
>> that plans change it'd likely be for the better. But I'm not excited
>> enough to fight hard about it.
> I don't really care enough. We have received some complaints about
> keeping plans stable, but maybe it's okay.
The other side of the coin is that there haven't been so many requests for
changing this; more than just this one, but not a groundswell. So 9.5
only seems like a good compromise unless we get more votes for back-patch.
I reviewed the patch and concluded that it would be better to split
compute_minimal_stats into two functions instead of sprinkling it so
liberally with if's. So I did that and pushed it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
