On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> I wrote:
> > Hm ... actually, we probably need *both* types of changes if that's
> > what we believe the state values mean.
I too was confused with the state explanations from the code-comments which
we have them now. With your explanation here clears that.
Thanks for explaining those.

After a bit more thinking and experimentation, I propose the attached
> patch.

I had a look over the patch and reviewed it. It is in excellent state to

>                         regards, tom lane

Jeevan B Chalke
Principal Software Engineer, Product Development
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Reply via email to