On 2015-09-26 21:54:46 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > We discussed this in some other thread, not long ago. I looked briefly > > in the archives but couldn't find it. I think the conclusion was > > something along the lines of "hmm, tough".
> That's hours, even days of fun ahead for sure. To me that's a somewhat serious bug, and something that we probably need to address at some point. > Honestly I have the feeling that the discussion of this thread gets > unproductive, let's not forget that the patch presented on this thread is > just aiming at adding one test case to ensure that extensions using > dumpable relations with FKs get correctly dumped, which is to ensure that > we do not reintroduce a bug that existed in the extension facility since > its introduction in 9.1. That being said, the patch is just fine for this > purpose, but that's just my opinion. It's an unsustainable test model. Adding own test runners, directories, initdb etc. for a simple regression test of a couple lines won't hurt for maybe the first five but after that it starts to get unmaintainable. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
