On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > I'm not arguing against any of this - but I don't think this needs to be > on the 9.5 open items list. I plan to remove from there.
Obviously I don't think that this is a critical fix. I do think that it would be nice to keep the branches in sync, and that might become a bit more difficult after 9.5 is released. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers