On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I'm not arguing against any of this - but I don't think this needs to be
> on the 9.5 open items list. I plan to remove from there.

Obviously I don't think that this is a critical fix. I do think that
it would be nice to keep the branches in sync, and that might become a
bit more difficult after 9.5 is released.

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to