Oct 2 2015 01:19 "Michael Paquier" <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Filip Rembiałkowski  <
filip.rembialkow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I just want to understand why there is LOCK TABLE not LOCK TABLE ONLY.
> It seems to me that you'd still want to use LOCK TABLE particularly if
> the dump is only done on a subset of tables, using --table for
> example.

Right. But please consider this use case, when I have to dunp only given
schema, nothing more and nothing less.

Is --schema option not just for that?

Locking child tables seems a bit counter-intuitive.

COPY does not touch child tables, also.

Reply via email to