Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> writes:
> I noticed cash_mul_int8 / cash_div_int8 are defined in cash.c,
> however, pg_proc.h and pg_operator.h contains no relevant entries.

> Is it just a careless oversight?

Hm.  I'd be inclined to fix that by removing the dead code, since
it's evidently useless.  For that matter, I doubt we need the int2
and flt4 variants; might as well depend on automatic promotions.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to