Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> writes: > I noticed cash_mul_int8 / cash_div_int8 are defined in cash.c, > however, pg_proc.h and pg_operator.h contains no relevant entries.
> Is it just a careless oversight? Hm. I'd be inclined to fix that by removing the dead code, since it's evidently useless. For that matter, I doubt we need the int2 and flt4 variants; might as well depend on automatic promotions. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers