Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> > If you want such an API, I won't stop you from using it, but I will not
> > use it myself. Please put in message-body commands as well.
> So, unsurprisingly, debbugs does support all commands that can be sent
> to control@ also through the n...@bugs.postgresql.org system; the command
> simply needs to be prefixed with 'Control: ' and then '-1' can be used
> as the bug number (so you don't have to figure out what the right number
> is, etc), like so:
> Control: close -1
> Control: tags -1 wontfix
Supposedly we will want our traffic to still flow via
pgsql-b...@postgresql.org, so the trick of grabbing the bug number from
the To address will not be available, will it?
Hmm, I guess we could have the bug form add
as headers, which should work for most people (since we reply-all), Josh
Berkus being the exception.
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: