On Saturday 04 January 2003 03:20 am, you wrote: > >I am sure, many of you would like to delete this message before reading, > > hold on. :-) > > I'm afraid most posters did not read the message. Those who replied > > "Why bother?" did not address your challenge:
Our challenges may be..;-) Anyway you are absolutely right. Looks like evrybody thought it as an attempt to convert postgresql to a thread per connection model. > >I think threads are useful in difference situations namely parallelising > >blocking conditions and using multiple CPUs. > > This is indeed one of the few good reasons for threads. Indeed, > large/robust systems use a mix. > > The consensus of the group is that those who do the work are not ready > for threads. Which is fine. Looking into my crystal ball, I see that > it will happen, though it appears so far away. I hope it happens and I will be able to contribute to it if I can. Shridhar ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
