On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> >> wrote: >> > Are you planning to work on this patch for 9.6? >> >> FWIW I hope so. It's a nice patch. >> > > I'm trying to to whisk dust. Rebased version of patch is attached. This > patch isn't passing regression tests because of plan changes. I'm not yet > sure about those changes: why they happens and are they really regression? > Since I'm not very familiar with planning of INSERT ON CONFLICT and RLS, > any help is appreciated. > Planner regression is fixed in the attached version of patch. It appears that get_cheapest_fractional_path_for_pathkeys() behaved wrong when no ordering is required. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
partial-sort-basic-4.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
