On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > Simple patch, applies and makes cleanly, does what it says and says what it > does. > > If a transaction holding locks aborts on an otherwise idle server, perhaps it > will take a very long time for a log-shipping standby to realize this. But I > have hard time believing that anyone who cares about that would be using > log-shipping (rather than streaming) anyway. > > Marking it ready for committer. > > The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
Thanks! That was deadly fast. Just wondering: shouldn't we keep the discussion around this patch on -bugs instead? Not saying you are wrong, Jeff, I am just not sure what would be the best practice regarding patches related to bugs. I would think that it is at least necessary to keep the person who reported the bug in CC to let him know the progress though. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
