On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> And now CF begins officially. The axe has fallen as promised 26 hours after.
>> Seeing no volunteers around, I can take the CFM hat for November's CF.
>> Any objections/complaints/remarks?
> I think that's great.  What, in your opinion, would be the most
> helpful thing for me to do to move things along?

Hm, I does not seem to me that you are the best fit for the patches
currently stated as "Ready for committer" as you did not much
participate in the threads related to them, except perhaps "SQL
function to report log message". I would think that Heikki is the one
who should take care of wrapping the patch for libpq and OOM, and the
stuff of pg_rewind. Andres would be suited for the bgwriter for
XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS. Finally the in-core regression test suite is a bit
more general... Perhaps Noah who worked on improving things in this
area in light of CVE-2014-0067, but I won't force any committer on it
either, I can understand that we're all busy.

So at this stage, I guess the main issue is to reduce the stack of
patches waiting for reviews with some first-level reviews. But this
applies to everybody here.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to