> Okay, I think one more point to consider is that it would be preferable to
> > have such an option for backend sessions and not for other processes
> > like WalSender.
> All right...I see the usage.. I withdraw my objection to 'session'
> prefix then now that I understand the case. So, do you agree that:
> *) session_idle_timeout: dumps the backend after X time in 'idle' state
> *) transaction_timeout: cancels transaction after X time, regardless of
> sounds good?
Not too much
*) transaction_timeout: cancels transaction after X time, regardless of
This is next level of statement_timeout. I can't to image sense. What is a
issue solved by this property?