On 11/04/2015 01:24 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I agree with Pavel.  Having a transaction timeout just does not make any
> sense.  I can see absolutely no use for it.  An idle-in-transaction
> timeout, on the other hand, is very useful.

+1 -- agreed


Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to