On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.harib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Haribabu Kommi > > <kommi.harib...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I marked this patch as ready for committer. > > > > The patch says: > > > > If a background worker registers to receive asynchronous notifications > > with the <command>LISTEN</command> through <acronym>SPI</acronym>, > > there is currently no way for incoming notifications to be received. > > > > But wouldn't it be more correct to say: > > > > If a background worker registers to receive asynchronous notifications > > with the <command>LISTEN</command> through <acronym>SPI</acronym>, the > > worker will log those notifications, but there is no programmatic way > > for the worker to intercept and respond to those notifications. > > Yes, the above description is good. +1 -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
