On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote:
> On 11/06/2015 11:31 PM, Lars Kanis wrote: > >> As a co-maintainer of the PostgreSQL adapter for Ruby, I would like to >> bridge the new SSL related functions to Ruby methods. However I wonder >> whether PQsslAttributes() is the best name for the function. Based on >> this name, I would expect to get key+value pairs instead of only the >> keys. IMHO PQsslAttributeNames() would express better, what the function >> does. >> > > Hmm, I think you're right. > > The question is, do we want to still change it? It's a new function in > 9.5, and we're just about to enter beta, so I guess we could, although > there might already be applications out there using it. If we do want to > rename it, now is the last chance to do it. > > Thoughts? I'm leaning towards changing it now. Uh, just to be clear, we been in beta for a month now, beta1 was released Oct 8. We are not just about to enter it... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
