Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Refresh my memory: what is the point of inventing an additional LAST > >> keyword, when the behavior is exactly the same as MOVE ALL ? > > > SQL compatibility, per Peter. > > Oh, I see. But then really it should be documented as a FETCH keyword, > not only a MOVE keyword. Will fix.
Yes. SQL standard doesn't have move, but it has FETCH LAST, so we borrowed it for MOVE. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
