<oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de> wrote: >> >> - cost parameter calibration: random_page_cost = 92.89 >> > > This demands some explanation and raises question of value of seq_page_cost > parameter -- I don't see anything about it your mail.
seq_page_cost was set to 1.0 (default), and I explained the reason about random_page_cost value in reply to Tom. Please see it. Thanks Ryoji -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
