On 14 November 2015 at 00:16, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can't see a way to make that work reliably. It would need to be
> 10^estimate_ln_weight(base) and the problem is that both exp and
> ln_weight could be too big to fit in double variables, and become
> HUGE_VAL, losing all precision.

Of course I meant 10^ln_weight could be too big to fit in a double.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to