On 10/13/15 4:12 PM, kolo hhmow wrote: > Yes, sorry. I was in hurry when I posted this message. > I dont understand whay in CheckPAMAuth function only PAM_USER item is > adding to pam information before authenticate? > Wheter it would be a problem to set additional pam information like > PAM_RHOST which is very useful because we can use this item to restrict > access to this ip address.
Your implementation uses NI_NUMERICHOST, but the documentation of pam_set_item speaks of a "hostname". Which is correct? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers