On 15 November 2015 at 10:41, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

>  So anyway, consider me nudged to finish my patch to provide capability
> for that by 1 Jan.

My earlier patch aimed to allow WALReceiver to wait on both a latch and a
socket as well as allow WALWriter to be active, so that WALReceiver could
reply more quickly and handle greater workload. As I explained previously
when we discussed that in recent posts, it is necessary infrastructure to
have anybody wait on anything higher than remote-fsync. I aim to complete
that by 1 Jan.

Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Reply via email to