Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> In general I think we can be a good deal more liberal about backpatching the >> testing regime than we are with production code, where we are always >> cautious, and the caution has paid big dividends in our reputation for >> stability.
> Attached are patches for 9.4 and 9.5 syncing up everything with > master. I tested both of them on OSX, Linux and Windows (MSVC only > though using vcregress tapcheck). I'm not in a position to double-check that these patches work on Windows, but I reviewed them through the expedient of diff'ing the patched files against HEAD. The only problem I found was you'd left out the documentation addition about needing IPC::Run in install-windows.sgml. So I've pushed them with that fix. Where do we now stand on invoking the TAP tests in the buildfarm? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers