On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > I seem to be able to produce these sorting patches at a much greater > rate than they can be committed, in part because Robert is the only > one that ever reviews them, and he is only one person. Since you think > the patch is good work, perhaps you can find the time to formally > review it.
Finding reviewing volunteers is a good thing, particularly on these times where we tend to have more patches than reviews, however I would suggest prioritizing the older items by beginning in what is in the current CF (47 items waiting for review at I write this message), 3 patches for the sorting work. FWIW, I think that this series of patches is interesting and have high value because particularly I have seen clear improvements particularly with raw dumps on schemas with many indexes (disclaimer: I am the guy Peter talked to regarding this patch though this was not on the top head nor of my TODOs). -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers