On 2015/11/19 5:29, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
On 2015/11/18 2:57, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
Oops, I've found another one.  I think we should update a comment in
postgresGetForeignPlan, too; add remote filtering expressions to the list
of
information needed to create a ForeignScan node.


Instead of saying "remote/local", how about saying "remote and local"
or just leaving it out altogether as in the attached?

+1 for your patch.

OK, committed.

Thanks!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to