On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > - > Is the main reason to have add_partial_path() is that it has some > less checks or is it that current add_path will give wrong answers > in any case? > > If there is no case where add_path can't work, then there is some > advanatge in retaining add_path() atleast in terms of maintining > the code.
To be specific, I mean to say about the logic of add_path(). With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
