On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> I'm not following along right now - in order to make cleanups the plan is to
>> revert a couple commits and then redo them prettyfied?
> Yes, essentially. Given the volume of updates, this seemed neater than
> framing those updates as in-tree incremental development.
I think that's an odd way of representing this work. I tend to
remember roughly when major things were committed even years later. An
outright revert should represent a total back out of the original
commit IMV. Otherwise, a git blame can be quite misleading. I can
imagine questioning my recollection, even when it is accurate, if only
because I don't expect this.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: