Justin Clift wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> <snip>
> > Let's suppose I am writing a query, and then I do \e to edit the query,
> > and I exit the editor and return to psql.  Suppose I decide I want to
> > reedit, so I up arrow.  I would expect to get \e, not the query I just
> > edited, no?
> Wouldn't it depend on how this gets implemented?
> Maybe least negative impact approach (suggested already): If the "large 
> command that was edited" is put in the command history before the \e, 
> then both are available and there is no big change from "expected 
> behaviour".
> i.e. one up arrow get the previous \e, and a second up arrow would bring 
> up the command that was worked upon.

Makese sense.  However, it still has the shock factor of displaying a
huge query, which is usually what is involved when using the editor.  I
don't feel strongly either way --- I am just pointing out the issue.

  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to