Hi Robert,

On 17/11/15 20:10, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 10 November 2015 at 01:47, Marco Nenciarini
>> <marco.nenciar...@2ndquadrant.it> wrote:
>>> I've attached a little patch that removes the errors when connected to 9.3.
>> Looks good to me. No point confusing users.
>> The other callers of RunIdentifySystem are pg_basebackup and
>> pg_receivelogical.
>> pg_basebackup doesn't ask for the db_name (passes null).
>> pg_receivelogical handles it being null already (and if it didn't,
>> it'd die with or without this patch).
>> pg_receivexlog expects it to be null and fails gracefully if it isn't.
>> So this change just removes some pointless noise.
> The fprintf(stderr, ...) does not cause a non-local exit, so the
> "else" just after it should be deleted.  Otherwise, when that branch
> is taken, *db_name doesn't get initialized at all.
> Actually, I'd suggest doing it like the attached instead, which seems
> a bit tighter.

I agree, your patch is better. 


Marco Nenciarini - 2ndQuadrant Italy
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
marco.nenciar...@2ndquadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to