On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Catalin Iacob <iacobcata...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> 1. -c no longer implies --no-psqlrc.  That's a backwards incompatibility,
>> but very easy to explain and very easy to work around.
>> 2. You can have multiple -c and/or -f.  Each -c is processed in
>> the traditional way, ie, either it's a single backslash command
>> or it's sent in a single PQexec.  That doesn't seem to me to have
>> much impact on the behavior of adjacent -c or -f.
>> 3. If you combine -1 with -c and/or -f, you get one BEGIN inserted
>> at the beginning and one COMMIT at the end.  Nothing else changes.

> I'll try to write the documentation patch for these semantics sometime
> next week.

Attached is my attempt at a documentation patch, feedback welcome. I'm
assuming Pavel will pick up the implementation, if not I could also
try it.

Attachment: Update-docs-for-repeated-c.patch
Description: binary/octet-stream

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to