On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > I'm only talking about the actual value in pg_stat_replication here, not > > what we are using internally. These are two different things of course - > > let's keep them separate for now. In pg_stat_replication, we explicitly > > check for InvalidXLogRecPtr and then explicitly set the resulting value > to > > NULL in the SQL return. > > No objections from here. I guess you already have a patch? > Well, no, because I haven't figured out which way is the logical one - make them all return NULL or make them all return 0/0... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
