On 12/2/15 7:00 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: > I notice that you don't set the 'waiting' flag. 'waiting' is presently > documented as: > > <entry>True if this backend is currently waiting on a lock</entry> > > ... but I'm inclined to just widen its definition and set it here, since > we most certainly are waiting, and the column isn't named > 'waiting_on_a_lock'. It shouldn't upset various canned lock monitoring > queries people have since they generally do an inner join on pg_locks > anyway.
I'm not so sure about that assumption. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
