On 12/2/15 7:00 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> I notice that you don't set the 'waiting' flag.  'waiting' is presently
> documented as:
>        <entry>True if this backend is currently waiting on a lock</entry>
> ... but I'm inclined to just widen its definition and set it here, since
> we most certainly are waiting, and the column isn't named
> 'waiting_on_a_lock'. It shouldn't upset various canned lock monitoring
> queries people have since they generally do an inner join on pg_locks
> anyway.

I'm not so sure about that assumption.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to