Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2015-12-04 12:50:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> which means Robert has already blown the planner's space consumption out
>> by close to a factor of 2, and I should stop worrying.
> FWIW, for me it's still <= 64 bytes:
No, it's not bare Path I'm worried about, it's IndexPath, which went
from 128 bytes in previous versions to 136 in HEAD. Likewise for
BitmapHeapPath, TidPath, ForeignPath, AppendPath, ResultPath,
MaterialPath, and possibly others.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
