On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Thank you for looking on this and the comment.
> At Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:00:32 +0900, Michael Paquier 
> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote in 
> <CAB7nPqQ69EPZkOqHAVuZXPxNzb_c2R5hs88tedLYqU9=zu6...@mail.gmail.com>
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> > <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > > What do you think about this solution?
> >
> > <please do not top-post, it breaks the logic of the thread>
> I believe I haven't ripped off any in CC: list or In-Reply-To and
> References in the previous post. (I read "top-post" as a post
> without these headers.)  Could you let me know how the message
> was broken?

20151126.144512.10228250.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp just did that
when you sent this new patch series:
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to