On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:27 PM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote:
>> Agreed that the "whole new language" aspect seems like way too big a
>> hammer, given what it actually does.
> Which would be easier to update when things change?

Regarding that both patches are equal compared to the current methods
with strcmp.

> Which would be possible to automatically generate from gram.y?

None of those patches take this approach.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to