On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 11:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
> > Wouldn't it be easier (and more portable, see 7.3/7.2 system catalogs vs. 
> > psql) to have views for that? Do I miss a point here?
> Putting the \d commands into views has been on the TODO list for a long time: 
> I think it is actually the only psql-related item left, until we change 
> the backend protocol to indicate transaction state. I don't think a view 
> would have helped with the psql 7.2/7.3 change: a lot more changed than 
> simply the underlying SQL.

It would be a wise idea to use the INFORMATION_SCHEMA where possible for
these, as that is pretty much guaranteed to be static in format.


PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to