Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> While I'm not familiar with the code itself, and can't post the exact
> slow query just yet, I have noticed that it is missing a
> CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() call to enable cancelling the slow query.  I'd
> backpatch this all the way back.  (The exact issue they hit is mutual
> recursion between touched_lseg_between_poly and lseg_between_poly.
> Since the latter also recurses on itself, the best way forward seem to
> add a check for interrupts in the loop there.)

Pushed this part.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to