On 15 December 2015 at 04:40, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> It gets written as part of the Form_pg_sequence each time we write a > sequence advance to WAL, but just seems to be a waste of space. > Agreed > Am I missing something obvious or should it just be removed? Or perhaps > replaced with the sequence's Oid in pg_class, since that'd be quite handy > for logical decoding of sequences. > If the name is wrong then probably other fields are wrong also when we do ALTER SEQUENCE? We should add the fields you need, but don't alter anything in Form_pg_sequence. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
