Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Ioseph Kim <pgsql...@postgresql.kr> wrote:
> > at PostgreSQL version 9.5rc1, > > at line 934 in pg_recvlogical.c > > > > set_pglocale_pgservice(argv[0],PG_TEXTDOMAIN("pg_recvlogical")); > > > > this references invalid catalog file, because pg_basebackup, > > pg_recvlogical, pg_receivexlog commands use same catalog file > > pg_basebackup.mo > > > > pg_receivexlog.c too. > > > > patch please. > > Yes, you are right. Both values do not match CATALOG_NAME in nls.mk. I > guess that something like the attached is fine then... The other > binaries are fine. Oops. We should have noticed this a long ago, since pg_receivexlog was introduced in 9.2 and pg_recvlogical in 9.4 ... judging by the misalignment in the spanish translation for --help, I have never tested the output of those programs. Pushed and backpatched as appropriate. Thanks. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers