> which is much closer to the actual number of rows removed by the index > recheck + the one left.
Is it better to be closer? We are saying those are the "actual" values not the estimates. If we cannot provide the actual rows, I think it is better to provide nothing. Something closer to the reality would create more confusion. Maybe, we just just return the number of blocks, and put somewhere a note about it. The actual row count is already available on the upper part of the plan. By the way, the estimation is a bigger problem than that. Please see my patch [1] about it. [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cae2gyzzjvzpy-1csgzjjyh69izsa13segfc4i4r2z0qbq2p...@mail.gmail.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
